{
  "documentType": "case_input",
  "schemaVersion": "0.1.0",
  "caseId": "case-example-001",
  "createdAt": "2026-07-15T12:10:00Z",
  "contractRef": {
    "contractId": "example-grounded-analysis",
    "contractVersion": "0.1.0",
    "contentHash": "sha256:c99c25a0a010f6e69774d0d7a187753a0cb328e8673a74b2b051fff44b1bf3a5"
  },
  "task": {
    "taskId": "task-example-001",
    "taskType": "evidence_grounded_analysis",
    "prompt": "Using Evidence E1 and E2, assess whether Initiative X is the primary cause of the observed improvement in Outcome Y. Give a concise conclusion and explain the evidence.",
    "taskInstructions": [],
    "expectedOutputFormat": "One concise analytical paragraph with evidence identifiers.",
    "contentHash": "sha256:deae115ef5c75b4b125e4dbb09937257231c21abcefcfb6b9c024804a1d14ec6",
    "metadata": {
      "requiresCausalAssessment": true
    }
  },
  "evidenceBundle": [
    {
      "evidenceId": "E1",
      "evidenceClassId": "supplied-study",
      "title": "Observational comparison",
      "content": "An observational comparison found Outcome Y was 18% higher in units using Initiative X. The authors state that units self-selected into the initiative and that the study does not identify a causal effect.",
      "contentHash": "sha256:192359f876334c9282c7e79247a6b78b913f63cfb032b68d8c0f7466e6cdce82",
      "authorityRank": 3,
      "permitted": true,
      "capturedAt": "2026-07-15T12:05:00Z",
      "metadata": {
        "studyDesign": "observational"
      }
    },
    {
      "evidenceId": "E2",
      "evidenceClassId": "supplied-study",
      "title": "Randomized pilot",
      "content": "A randomized pilot estimated a 4% improvement in Outcome Y. The confidence interval included zero, so the pilot did not establish a statistically distinguishable effect.",
      "contentHash": "sha256:b3bba4e3b5b48b3ace0ec78b81738a837464d94d945689b57065d2f8f50c4428",
      "authorityRank": 3,
      "permitted": true,
      "capturedAt": "2026-07-15T12:05:00Z",
      "metadata": {
        "studyDesign": "randomized_pilot"
      }
    }
  ],
  "attempt": {
    "attemptId": "attempt-example-001",
    "authorId": "worker-104",
    "content": "Initiative X is associated with higher Outcome Y, but the supplied evidence does not establish that it is the primary cause. E1 reports an 18% observational difference while explicitly noting self-selection and no causal identification. E2 estimates a 4% improvement, but its interval includes zero. The strongest justified conclusion is that X may contribute to the improvement; primacy remains unproven.",
    "contentHash": "sha256:8d0c8290f24f40ae2ca136a7556dbaa2938591a756497506d927d6fc28d43a64",
    "submittedAt": "2026-07-15T12:08:00Z",
    "attachments": [],
    "toolTraces": []
  },
  "humanReview": {
    "annotationId": "review-example-001",
    "reviewerId": "reviewer-207",
    "label": "fail",
    "score": 0,
    "reasonCodes": [
      "not_direct_answer"
    ],
    "rationale": "Fail. The attempter did not choose yes or no and therefore did not answer the question directly.",
    "criterionAnnotations": [
      {
        "criterionId": "C1-direct-response",
        "verdict": "not_met",
        "severity": "major",
        "rationale": "The response did not choose yes or no.",
        "citedSpans": [
          {
            "artifactType": "attempt",
            "artifactId": "attempt-example-001",
            "quotedText": "the supplied evidence does not establish that it is the primary cause",
            "locator": "sentence 1"
          }
        ]
      }
    ],
    "reviewerConfidence": {
      "rawScore": 0.9,
      "band": "uncalibrated"
    },
    "submittedAt": "2026-07-15T12:09:00Z"
  },
  "referenceAnswers": [
    {
      "referenceId": "reference-example-001",
      "role": "illustrative",
      "content": "The evidence suggests a possible contribution from X but does not establish that X is the primary cause.",
      "contentHash": "sha256:83260b932b3b8b56d7785dc4ff7d859c2cc77426b927cba51ae6f2571d9c04d0"
    }
  ],
  "declaredExpectedElements": [],
  "caseTags": [
    "synthetic",
    "positive-attempt",
    "incorrect-human-fail",
    "causal-warrant"
  ],
  "metadata": {
    "example": true
  }
}